Whats wrong with cheap cat5e cable?
The problem is networks installed with this cable will never comply with the Cat5e standards. This is due to the different electrical properties of aluminium over copper. These cable often have markings like Cat5e ANSI/TIA-568-C, ISO/IEC 11801 or BS EN 50173 fooling the buyer into thinking they are compliant.
The standard clearly states “the conductor shall be annealed solid copper and comply with the requirements of EN 50288-1:2003, 4.1. The conductor shall be plain or metal coated. NOTE Copper covered (clad) aluminium and/or steel conductors are not permitted.”
The resistivity of annealed copper is 1,72 x 10-8 whereas the resistivity of aluminium is 2,82 x 10-8. The resistance of an aluminium conductor is therefore 64% above that of copper conductor of equal cross-sectional area. The production of a composite CCA conductor produces conductors that have resistance approximately 40% above the copper equivalent.
Put simply CCA over pure copper Cat5 is:
- 40% Higher resistance
- Poor flexibility and can break easily
- Easily oxidises causing poor terminations in the patch panel and module
- Not suitable for Power over Ethernet (PoE) due to the resistance
- Prone to breaking as aluminium is much less mailable than copper. This makes it harder to terminate and more likely snap conductors if you need to relocate the cables.
There are some applications where CCA can be used, such as analogue CCTV over cat5 twisted pair but this will still exhibit poorer performance and transmission distances will be reduced.
- Always check the markings on the cable jacket anything marked CCA or equivalent.
- Check the conductor core by scoring with a knife
- Always buy known brands from reputable suppliers
The Fibre Optic Association has a youTube video showing how serious the problem is. See below.
The Fibre Optic Association have published a full white paper on the issue http://www.fia-online.co.uk/pdf/Whites/wp-IAN002-01.pdf
Comments are closed.